You are here: Lobbying Efforts / WHEREAS
WHEREAS
Philosophical/Conscientious Exemption from Vaccinations for the State of New JerseyTo: New Jersey Legislature, General Public
WHEREAS currently, the following 22 states have philosophical exemptions for vaccines: Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Wyoming, Washington and Wisconsin. A September 5, 1997 report of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee stated that there was no correlation between states which allow philosophical exemption and vaccination coverage and there is no detrimental impact on child health and well being in the United States. ["A brief history of the mandatory vaccination agenda," by Dr. Kristine Severyn, The Idaho Observer, Jan. 2000, p. 12-13]
WHEREAS in the 1950's Christian Scientists obtained religious exemptions to vaccinations in 47 out of 50 states excluding Mississippi and West Virginia (Minn. has Philosophical Exemption in lieu of Religious Exemption), vaccinations for school entry started to be uniformly mandated and coerced through the Federal Vaccination Assistance Act of 1962 which provided federal assistance to states and local departments of Health to increase vaccination rates. ["A brief history of the mandatory vaccination agenda," by Dr. Kristine Severyn, The Idaho Observer , Jan 2000, p. 12-13] According to Dr. Eddy Bresnitz of the NJ Health Department in a letter dated December 20, 2000 "The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides incentive funding to states, up to $100 for each child age-appropriately immunized at two years of age. The actual rate per vaccinated child is based on the overall state immunization rate. The New Jersey Immunization Program received $924,450 and $1,202,869 for use in 1999 and 2000, respectively. The CDC has advised states that incentive funding will no longer be awarded to state immunization programs in calendar year 2001 and thereafter.", and
WHEREAS in 1986, the Federal National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act was passed as deaths and serious injuries from the mandatory injections were acknowledged by Government and vaccine manufacturers. A Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) was established through this act, but more importantly Vaccine Manufacturers were relieved of ALL liability for Vaccine Injury and death provided that the vaccines could be legally mandated, by state legislatures for school entry. "No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after the effective date of this part (1986) solely do to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party (or the injured party's legal representative) of the potential dangers resulting from the administration of the vaccine manufactured by the manufacturer." [Public Health Service Act, Section 2122, Direct Warnings], and
WHEREAS doctors are extremely reluctant to report vaccine related deaths. Cases have been reported where parents told doctors that they thought the infant death was vaccine related, the doctor told them that if they ever mentioned that again he would accuse them of "Shaken Baby Syndrome". This is no idle threat. Please see "Was it Murder or a Bad Vaccine?" in Redbook, September 2000. At least four NJ families have been falsely accused of "Shaken Baby Syndrome". One was mentioned in the Redbook article. Three of the four families were acquitted, but lost their homes due to legal expenses. The fourth case is still pending. Again, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act is a problem because it states that if the Death Certificate states that the baby died from a vaccine, the parents qualify for compensation. Coroners have difficulty writing that the baby died from a vaccine even if it is perfectly obvious, because the Pharmaceutical Companies are unwilling to give a profile of vaccine death for coroners to match. When parents complain, coroners have been known to say: "You are lucky you were not accused of "Shaken Baby Syndrome," and
WHEREAS the Health Department says that vaccines are safe and effective, even though the Physician's Desk Reference lists many ways to die from vaccination, including SIDS, anaphylactic shock, thrombocytopenia, (hemorrhaging to death), encephalitis (brain inflammation) and 'death.' Other side effects include but are not limited to seizures, infantile spasms, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Bell's Palsy, aseptic meningitis, transverse myelitis, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, arthralgia, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (flesh eating disease) erythema multiforme, diabetes mellitus, urticaria, systemic lupus erthematosus (SLE), elevation of liver enzymes, optic neuritis, nerve deafness, keratitis, otitis media, renal failure, early onset Hib disease, lymphadenopathy, reflux esophagitis, vitreous hemorrhage, atypical measles, parotitis (mumps), impetigo, cellulitis, herpes zoster, asthma, vesiculation, ulceration, necrosis. Although autism is not listed as a side effect of vaccines, encephalitis has the identical symptoms as autism and encephalitis is listed as an adverse reaction to every single childhood vaccine. [Vaccination, Social Violence and Criminality: The Medical Assault on the American Brain , 1990, Harris Coulter, Ph.D.]
WHEREAS the Health Department says that vaccine safety is a proven fact, a claim that cannot be reconciled with the Vaccine Manufacturer's package inserts which state that no long term testing for adverse reactions or efficacy has ever been conducted on any vaccine, thereby rendering the mandated injections experimental in nature. This is strictly in violation of the Nuremberg Code which specifies that the consent of the individual (infant) being experimented on is absolutely essential. "Infranix has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic, mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility." [Infranix, DTaP, SmithKline Beecham, 2001] "Animal reproductive studies have not been conducted with IPOL. It is also not known whether IPOL can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity." [IPOL, Polio, Aventis Pasteur, 2001] "The number of subjects studied with TriHIBit, ActHIB combined with Tripedia by reconstitution, was inadequate to detect rare serious adverse events." [Hib, ActHIB, Aventis Pasteur] : ". . .it may not prevent infection in individuals who do not achieve protective antibody titers." [Hep B, Engerix-B, SmithKline Beecham, 2001], and
WHEREAS regarding 'fertility impairment' , Registered Dog Breeder, Ashleigh Oulton in Australia, testified that she and other dog breeders had to stop vaccinating dogs to get them to reproduce. ".Even once they've stopped vaccinating, residue results through infertility, arthritic conditions.dogs have one tenth of the length of a generation that a human does, so what we are seeing in dogs today is what we will see in the future with humans, and that's a really frightening thing. . ." This was taken from the Australian Video: Vaccination-The Hidden Truth , Copyright Taycare Pty Ltd (Web: http://www.vaccination.inoz.com, and
WHEREAS no long term testing is done according to the Vaccine manufacturers; additionally, short term testing is extremely short in duration and practiced on age groups other than the ones to receive the vaccine. ". . .147 healthy infants and children (up to 10 years of age) were monitored for 5 days after each dose." [Hep B, Recombivax HB, Merck, 2001] "In testing, children were monitored daily for five days after each injection for local reactions and systemic complaints." [Hib/Hep B, Comvax, Merck, 2001] According to Rampton and Stauber, authors of Trust Us, We're Experts: How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with your Future, 2001: A host of techniques exist for manipulating research protocols to produce studies whose conclusions fit their sponsor's predetermined interests. These techniques include adjusting the time of a study (so that toxic effects do not have time to emerge), subtle manipulations of target and control groups or dosage levels, and subjective interpretations of complex data. Often such methods stop short of outright fraud, but lead to predictable results. (p. 218), and
WHEREAS the phrase "Unpublished data on file at Pharmaceutical Companies" appears in all vaccine package inserts. This brings out the point that studies used to justify FDA acceptance of vaccinations are not available for peer review which is highly unusual and makes the data very suspect. Further the FDA does no independent testing of its own, and
WHEREAS new vaccines are often substituted for vaccines already on the market with no testing at all. In the case of the Hepatitis B vaccine, the recombinant version was substituted for the plasma version . The PDR for both the Merck and SmithKline versions state. "Testing was done on the plasma-derived vaccine." (Not this one.) Four in one-vaccines are substituted for multiple vaccines with unpredictable results. VAERS data for deaths from chickenpox vaccine revealed that 21 out of 47 deaths received MMR with Varicella vaccine. Merck has just announced a new vaccine called ProQuad which is a combination of MMR and Varicella. [Vaccine attacks four childhood diseases, by Ed Susman, UPI Science News, from the Science and Technology Desk, Published 4/11/03] Most parents are not aware their babies are receiving untested vaccines, and
WHEREAS the number of vaccines forced on infants, by law, has doubled in the last 12 years, according to the Vaccine Package Inserts no studies are being done to determine if it is safe to give vaccines concurrently. "Routine administration of DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) and /or OPV (oral polio vaccine), concomitantly with measles, mumps and rubella vaccines is not recommended because there are insufficient data relating to the simultaneous administration of these antigens. However, the American Academy of Pediatrics has noted that in some circumstances, particularly when the patient may not return, some practitioners prefer to administer all these antigens on a single day. If done, separate sites and syringes should be used for DTP and M-R VAX II." [Measles & Rubella Live, M-R VAX II, Merck, 2001] , and
WHEREAS according to the Vaccine Package Inserts no allowance is made for sick or pre-term infants with regard to receiving vaccinations. "All vaccines can be administered to persons with mild illness such as diarrhea, mild upper-respiratory infection with or without low-grade fever, or other low grade febrile illness." [DTaP, Tripedia, Aventis Pasteur, 2001] "Pre-term infants should be vaccinated according to their chronological age, calculated from date of birth." [DTaP, Acel-Imune, Lederle Consumer, 2001]. In the past, conventional wisdom, common-sense and even vaccination policy recognized that a baby was more likely to die from a vaccine under these circumstances. Now it appears that the drug industry is instructing doctors to take serious risks with the health of already compromised infants, and
WHEREAS Health Officials say the age of the baby is not important in vaccinating, and doctors will commonly dismiss documented side effects, such as Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), as rarely ever happening. However, in 1975, Japan passed a law prohibiting any baby from being vaccinated under the age of two. The immediate result of that action was that Japan went from number 17 in infant mortality to number one with the lowest infant mortality rate in the world. Thirteen years later they allowed infants to be vaccinated again and the infant mortality rate went up. Further, the MMR (Measles, Mumps and Rubella) vaccine has not been used in Japan since 1993. In 1998, Japan overturned all of its mandatory vaccination laws due to the high cost of compensating vaccine injury victims, [Vaccination, Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., 1993, p. 46-49], and
WHEREAS according to Government Statistics, the number of infant deaths in the US for the year 1998 was 28,325. This comes out to 77 babies per day. If a substantial fraction of these deaths were preventable by not vaccinating, as was the case in Japan, then the real number of babies dying from vaccinations will not have been negligible. From January 1990 to November 2001, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) recorded 5,032 deaths from vaccination. It is commonly accepted that only 10% of vaccine deaths and injuries are reported to VAERS. Consequently, over the last 11 years, the real number of vaccine induced deaths could be 50, 000 or more, and
WHEREAS in 1982 Dr. William C. Torch gave a report at the 34 th annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. The study of "150 DPT post-vaccinal deaths" found that about 50 percent of those deaths occurred within 24 hours of the DPT vaccination, 75 percent occurred within 72 hours of the vaccination, and 90 percent occurred within one week of the vaccination. The remaining 10 percent occurred within 20 months of the vaccination following "protracted reactions." [Vaccination, Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., 1993, p. 60], and
WHEREAS in her book Vaccinations , 1993, Australian Medical researcher Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. does a quite exhaustive review of the inconsistencies in medical studies used in vaccine research. Most particularly, she points out that when babies die in these vaccination studies, they are "thrown out" of the study. Researchers justify this by saying it is "just a coincidence" that the baby died 3 or 4 days after vaccination. There is no curiosity about why the baby died or if it could have been vaccine related. One example is the Navajo Indian Study referenced in the Hib vaccine PDR's (p. 128-131). No deaths are mentioned in the PDR. However Viera Scheibner requested the original data. She points out that 8 babies died in the control group and 8 babies died in the vaccinated group. The death rate in this study (16/4161) was higher than the national SIDS rate. When vaccination studies are done, even the control group gets vaccinated. The "placebo" in this case included lactose which is highly allergenic. So those who think that vaccinated babies are being compared with completely unvaccinated babies are mislead. A valid (completely unvaccinated) control group might produce no deaths, thereby leading to the conclusion that SIDS is a consequence of vaccination, an undesirable admission from the point of view of vaccine producers. It appears that the comparison has been avoided. This is not proper scientific method or intellectual integrity by any stretch of the imagination, and
WHEREAS all package inserts include disclaimers of vaccination efficacy: ". . .it may not prevent infection in individuals who do not achieve protective antibody titers." [Hep B, Engerix-B, SmithKline Beecham, 2001] "The evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between immunization with Hib conjugate vaccines and early-onset of Hib Disease." [Hib, ActHIB, Aventis Pasteur, 2001] "Liquid PedvaxHIB will not protect against disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae other than type b or against other microorganisms that cause invasive disease such as meningitis or sepsis." [Hib, Liquid PedvaxHIB, Merck] "As reported with Haemophilus B Polysaccharide Vaccine and another Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccine, cases of Haemophilus b Disease may occur in the week after the vaccination, prior to the onset of the protective effects of the vaccine."[Hib/HepB, Comvax, Merck] Death and severe injury from vaccinations should not be imposed on any segment of the population when it is impossible to predict if the vaccine will work with any given individual, and
WHEREAS the package inserts admit that you can get the disease from the vaccine : "Excretion of small amounts of the live attenuated rubella virus from the nose and throat has occurred in the majority of susceptible individuals 7-28 days after vaccination. There is no confirmed evidence to indicate that such virus is transmitted to susceptible persons who are in contact with the vaccinated individuals. Consequently, transmission through close personal contact, while accepted as a theoretical possibility, is not regarded as a significant risk. However, transmission of the rubella vaccine virus to infants via breast milk has been documented." [MR, BIAVAX II, Merck, 2001] "The duration of protection of VARIVAX is unknown at present and the need for booster doses is not defined. Post-marketing experience suggests that transmission of vaccine virus may occur rarely between healthy vacinees who develop a varicella-like rash and healthy susceptible contacts. Transmission of vaccine virus from vaccinees without a varicella-like rash has been reported. Among a subset of vaccinees who were actively followed, 259 were exposed to an individual with chickenpox in a household setting.20% reported a mild form of chickenpox." [Chickenpox, VARIVAX, Merck, 2001], and
WHEREAS in 1908 the English Parliament enacted a "Conscience Clause" allowing exemptions for those not wanting the smallpox vaccination. The law was prompted by a recommendation from the Royal Commission on Vaccination (1889-96) investigating the facts that the death rate from smallpox INCREASED after mandatory vaccination laws were enacted and the program also resulted in a dramatic increase in syphillus among infants and adults according to Charles Creighton, professor of Microscopic Anatomy at Cambridge and author of Epidemics of Great Britain (see also Encyclopedia Britannica 9 th Edition, Vol. 24, p23). Interestingly, in Germany in 1908, a Dr. Paul Ehrlich shared a Noble Prize with another researcher (unrelated work) for his "discovery" of the 'antibody theory'[Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Edition], perhaps designed to jumpstart a dying interest in vaccinations, and
WHEREAS the claim of the inoculators that the injected vaccine or serum creates "anti-toxins or anti-bodies" to combat the systemic poison, which is based on Ehrlich's doctrine of the defending entities, is purely a medical hypothesis-unproved and unprovable. Dr. Walter Hadwen, a well-known English authority who lectured in the United States in 1922, said: "Nobody has ever seen the anti-toxins or anti-bodies at work. They have never been isolated or shown in a test-tube. 'Science' says they are there and you must accept it if you can." [Medical Voodoo , Annie Riley Hale, a 1935, p. 51]
WHEREAS according to Dr. Dean Black, author of Immunization: Compulsion or Choice (1994 ) , when we say that vaccinations are 70% to 90% effective we mean that 70 to 90% of all persons vaccinated will produce antibodies. Judging by the following definition found in the AMA Family Medical Guide , even the AMA has its doubts about the advantages of producing antibodies: "Antibodies are complex substances formed to neutralize or destroy foreign substances or organisms (antigens) in the blood. Each individual type of antibody recognized only the substance or organism that provokes its formation. Anti-body activity normally fights infection, but can be damaging in allergies and a group of maladies that are called autoimmune diseases." [AMA Family Medical Guide, c. 1987, p. 789], and
WHEREAS according to Walene James, author of Immunization , The Reality Behind the Myth , 1995: "Vaccines isolate antibody function, and allow it to substitute for the entire immune response. Scientific evidence questioning the role of antibodies in disease protection can be found in research performed by Dr. Alec Burton, published in a study by the British Medical Council in May 1950. The study investigated the relationship between the incidence of diphtheria and the presence of antibodies. Since Diphtheria was epidemic at, or just prior to, the time of the study, the researchers had a large number of cases to investigate. The purpose of the research was to determine the existence or nonexistence of antibodies in people who developed diphtheria and in those who did not. It looked at patients and people who were in close proximity to patients, such as physicians, nurses in hospitals, family, and friends. The conclusion was that there was no relation whatsoever between antibody count and incidence of disease. The researchers found people who were highly resistant with extremely low antibody counts, and people who developed the disease repeatedly, who had high antibody counts. Dr. Burton also discovered that children born with a-gamma globulinemia (an inability to produce antibodies) develop and recover from measles and other infectious or contagious disease almost as spontaneously as other children."
http://www.garynull.com, and
WHEREAS Guillain-Barre Syndrome is an uncommon and acute from of peripheral neuropathy, which can follow virtually any sort of viral infection or even an immunization. Why it occurs is not clear. Some physicians think it may be caused by an unpredictable allergic reaction to the virus that caused the illness or to the vaccine used in the immunization. The symptoms appear a few days after the causative illness has cleared up or the immunization has been given, and they are often severe. Within hours, a sensation of tingling then numbness, then weakness or even paralysis may spread from your hands and feet to the rest of your body. Often, the paralysis affects your breathing, and intensive hospital care becomes necessary. Unlike longer-term forms of peripheral neuropathy, the nerve damage of Guillain-Barre syndrome is usually only temporary. New treatments such as plasmapheresis (which removes damaging antibodies from the blood) may improve the outlook for a full recovery from severe attacks, but you may need physical therapy for many months to return to normal health . [ AMA Family Medical Guide , p. 285, c. 1987] Guillain-Barre Syndrome is listed as a potential side effect of every single childhood vaccine and yet the AMA Family Medical Guide suggests that removing antibodies from the blood sometimes results in a cure. Obviously there is no consensus within the orthodox medical community as to whether it is desirable to produce "anti-bodies" or not, and
WHEREAS the popular notion of "herd immunity" says that a certain threshold of the population must be vaccinated under threat of the return of the dread disease, common sense and medical statistics suggest otherwise. Bubonic plague has never returned in the absence of vaccinations. Also scarlet fever had a much higher death rate and was more dreaded than smallpox in Victorian England. The 'herd immunity' theory underlying forced vaccination practice can easily be disputed with the attached graph showing Scarlet fever and Smallpox Death rates from 1838-1922 http://www.healthsentinal.com. No vaccine was ever widely used for scarlet fever so apparently these are at least two examples of diseases that did not require "herd immunity". "Herd Immunity" is another concept like anti-body theory, that is unproven and unprovable. In order for studies to be considered scientific, they have to be available to be refuted. Since Medical Research is always done with the endpoint in mind it is impossible to refute their hypotheses. "The difference between science and pseudoscience . is that genuinely scientific theories are "falsifiable"-that is, they are formulated in such a way that if they are wrong, they can be proven false through experiments. By contrast, pseudosciences are formulated so vaguely that they can never be proven or disproven.. . .By this criterion you will find that a surprising number of seemingly scientific assertions-perhaps many in which you devoutly believe-are complete nonsense. Rather surprisingly this is not to assert that all pseudoscientific claims are untrue. Some of them may be true, but you can never know this, so they are not entitled to claim the cast-iron assurance and reliance that you can have, and place, in scientific facts." [Trust Us, We're Experts!, Sheldon Rampton & John Stauber, c. 2001, p. 56], and
WHEREAS the list of vaccine ingredients includes aluminum, formaldehyde, mercury, horse feces, aborted human fetuses, chicken embryo, ground up encephalitic mouse brains and an incalculable amount of live and killed (live with formaldehyde) viruses, whose effects on the body are extremely unpredictable, etc. We go to great trouble to keep all of these poisons and toxins out of our drinking water and yet when we take this filth and inject it directly into the bloodstream of an infant whose brain is still developing we completely abandon common sense, and give the pharmaceutical industry the benefit of the doubt. "Think of the unparalleled absurdity of deliberately infecting the organism of a healthy child, in this era of sanitary science and aseptic surgery, with the poisonous matter obtained from a sore on a diseased calf, under the pretence of protecting the victim of disease! Can inconsistency go further than this! Inoculating an indeterminate lot of microbes into a healthy organism under aseptic precautions! Just think of it!" [Dr. J.M. Hodge, Niagara Falls, NY, in a paper read before the Western New York Homeopathic Medical Society, Buffalo, April 11 th , 1902], and
WHEREAS in earlier times the use of live viruses was debated among vaccinators. Prof. McIntosh made a condemnation of the use of a living virus for vaccination purposes in his Presidential Address to the Royal Society of Medicine , on October 19, 1926: "Scientifically, it cannot be disputed that from every point of view the injection of virus capable of multiplying in the body of the individual is bad. When multiplication of the virus occurs, then there is no possibility of estimating the dose to which the patient has been subjected. Thus the effect cannot be controlled, and in susceptible individuals this may lead to unforeseen results." He also added: "It has recently been shown that nervous disabilities (meningo-encaphalo-myelitis, etc.) may follow vaccination, either as a direct effect or as a sequel to the lowering of the general resistance of the body. From time to time there have been attempts to reintroduce the use of an attenuated living virus as a prophylactic measure in certain other human diseases; particularly is this true in regard to tuberculosis. This, I am sure, is an innovation which should be rigorously opposed as a retrograde step; who knows for how long an attenuated bacillus can lie dormant, and then assume its former virulence?" [ The Vaccination Problem , Joseph P. Swan, London, Daniel, 1936, p. 184-5], and
WHEREAS on April 1, 2001, Dr. Vijendra K. Singh, Ph. D. from Utah State University testified at a Congressional Hearing on Autism in Washington, DC. Constitent with Prof. MacIntosh's analysis 75 years earlier (see previous paragraph), Singh identified a hyperimmune response (or increase of antibodies) for the measles virus in the MMR vaccine in a significant number of autistic children. "Succinctly, I made two very important observations: first, there was indeed a hyperimmune response to a virus and it was specifically for the measles virus (MV) but not for other viruses tested.and secondly, there was an association between measles virus antibodies and MBP autoantibodies (i.e., the higher the measles antibody level the greater the chance of brain autoantibody.).In summary, the rapidly accumulating evidence strongly implicates autoimmunity in autsim, which in many may result from a vaccine injury. There is a possibility of an atypical measles in autism, but the evidence also suggests a MMR vaccine infection..We must find new ways to curb adverse effects of vaccines, including autism," and
WHEREAS live viruses in vaccines are known to cause heart disease. Live virus vaccines induce a physiological state in the body called "hypercoagulability" giving the person an increased potential to a thrombosis or blood clot. The primary blame for narrowed blood vessels and clot formation is placed on elevated cholesterol levels. But it is the adherence of microbes to the endothelial lining of the blood vessels and subsequent fibrin deposition that is the underlying mechanism of action for cardiovascular disease. [Friedman, H.M. Virus infections of endothelial cells. Journal of Infectious Disease . Feb. 1, 1981; 143 (2): 266-73] In fact, a recent edition of Critical Care Medicine describes in detail the number of different types of viruses that can cause hypercoagulability: "Direct interaction between microorganisms and endothelial cells can also occur, especially in the case of viral infections. Endothelial cell perturbation (disturbance) is a common feature of viral infection and can alter hemostasis in both a direct and indirect manner. Endothelial cells can be directly infected by a number of viruses (e.g. herpes simplex, adenovirus, parainfluenzavirus, poliovirus , echovirus, measles virus, mumps virus , cytomegalovirus, human T-cell lymphoma virus type I, and HIV. [Marcel Levi, MD. Edothelium: Interface between coagulation and inflammation. Critical Care Medicine Vol 30, No. 5. May 2002 .] Once this complication from vaccines is exposed we are only one small step from questioning the unspoken impact that all vaccines have on health. "It is my personal opinion that the impact of the viral load caused by vaccines has been overwhelmingly underestimated and is creating hypercoagulability problems in people of all ages. The virus-hypercoagulability connection will eventually prove to be the "missing link" in connecting a myriad of health problems to our one-size-fits-all mass vaccination policies." Dr. Sherri Tenpenny http://www.mercola.com, Issue 421, 4-19-03 Smallpox Vaccines and Heart Disease, No "Coincidence"], and
WHEREAS the Rubella vaccine, produced by Merck and Co. was cultivated using tissue from an aborted baby during the 1964 rubella epidemic when some mothers were advised to have abortions, rather than risk their child being born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome. It was from the 27 th baby aborted and immediately dissected that the active rubella virus was found. It was commonly referred to as RA27/3, where R=Rubella, A=Abortus, 27=27 th fetus, 3=third tissue culture explant. The vaccine virus was then cultivated in the lung tissue of another aborted female baby approximately 3 months gestation. The new vaccine was developed in Philadelphia, PA and tested on orphans ( American Journal Diseases of Children , Vol. 110, Oct. 1965) The Chickenpox vaccine was also derived from an aborted child: "Fetal lung tissue taken from a 14-week-old male fetus removed for psychiatric reasons from a 27-year-old woman." (Jacobs, Nature , 7/11/70) [http://www.cogforlife.org], and
WHEREAS in addition to live viruses, ". the vaccine contains aborted human fetal tissue from both male and female 3 month old fetuses as well as guinea pig parts." [Chickenpox, VARIVAX, Merck, 2001] Apart from the moral objections to using aborted human fetuses and tortured animals in the production of vaccines, it is the animal serum proteins found in all vaccines that are thought to be the mechanism for causing auto-immune disorders. Fetal Bovine Serum: Immune complex diseases have been suspected in vaccines for many years. In 1911, Clemens von Pirquet noted that patients who were being treated for diphtheria with serum from horses immunized with diphtheria could develop joint inflammation, arthritis, skin rashes and fever. He correctly determined that this was an immune response to something in the serum proteins. He called it serum sickness. It is also called hypersensitivity disease. There are two types of serum sickness; acute and chronic. Both are caused by the development and deposit of immune complexes (antigens and antibodies resulting from the injection) in kidneys, lungs, arteries, synovia of the joints resulting in both short term and possible long term arthritis, vasculitis, and nephritis. The symptoms may be short lived, unless the foreign antigen or protein is injected again. Symptoms generally begin approximately 7-10 days after exposure, it takes that long for a primary immune response in an unsensitized individual. [Luftig, Ronald B. 1998. Microbiology and Immunology. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia 183-229] Testimony of Laurie Perrin, NJ Senate Oversight Hearing Hep b, 5/25/00, and
WHEREAS some vaccines are genetically engineered. From "Feds Race to Make SARS Vaccine" (May 28, 2003) Associated press [http://www.wired.com] "Vaccines based on genetic engineering may be faster. One approach is using gene-splicing to make plenty of SARS virus parts, such as the protein prongs that stick out from the virus, giving it a crown-like appearance under a microscope. Injecting these proteins-but not the virus itself-may be enough to prompt the immune system to recognize the SARS virus. A vaccine made this way works well against hepatitis B. But like killed viruses, the bare proteins can also trigger wimpy or aberrant immune responses. Nabel's own lab is taking another gene-based approach-harmless viruses hollowed out to carry SARS genes into the body. Many such delivery vehicles are possible, but Nabel uses a weakened adenovirus, a bug that ordinarily causes colds, that is fitted out with SARS DNA." The live viruses are hard enough on the body. We do not need " Franken-viruses" to contend with as well, and
WHEREAS it is never really possible for parents to know what is in the vaccine or if it is contaminated. "Merck Hit for Plant Problems", Ed Silverman, Star-Ledger , 1/8/2002: The FDA found Merck improperly performed procedures for sterility, testing and documentation, among other things... They were notified by regulators at the same time Merck bid-on and lost-a $428 million contract to make smallpox vaccine for the federal government. Products made at Merck's Building 29, part of a huge research and manufacturing facility in West Point, PA, include Varivax, a chicken pox vaccine; a vaccine for MMR, or measles, mumps and rubella; and vaccines for Hepatitis A and B, the spokesman confirmed. From the actual FDA inspection report (released on 1/4/2002) to Allan Shaw and James R. Laser in West Point, PA; obtained by Illinois Vaccine Awareness Coalition http://www.vaccineawareness.org/information/MerckInspection.htm:
"Unsealed. vials of VARIVAX lyophilized powder are routinely held.and are then sealed in an uncontrolled room.yet the container/closure study for the unsealed.vial/stopper combination for this product.failed the microbial ingress challenge.this container closure study was not submitted as part of the supplement to the === for the process upgrade for this product.the cover letter for this supplement also fails to note the new stopper as one of the changes in the process upgrade."
"There is no assurance that VARIVAX vials can maintain intended vacuum levels.""The firm's investigation into the sterility failure of lot===VARIVAX fails to note, and therefore address, all potential causes for the failure, including the container closure study which documented microbial ingress into crimped containers."
"The firm's investigation and corrective action with regard to the sterility failure of VARIVAX lot === were inadequate, in that : b) they failed to document the rationale for their determination of potentially associated lots, and they continued to manufacture and release the product without determining the root cause for the failure.c) they failed to enter the suspect lot and the associated 'sister' lots into the quarantine system.e) the (Standard Operating Procedures) only requires manufacturing investigation to be initiated after the sterility failure is validated by a laboratory investigation. This precludes a prompt determination of the root cause for the failure, yet the firm will continue to ship potentially associated product until a root-cause determination implicates additional lots."
"An Atypical Process Report===dated 2/22/01 reported finding particulates in lyophilized vials of MMRII lot=== Investigation tied in VARIVAX as also having this issue. The investigation determined the defect to be a fine dispersion of smaller particles rather that a particulate: a) The source of stainless steel elements found in vials of MMR and VARIVAX has not been determined, b) The classification of the issue has resulted in reducing the level of defect to minor from critical. Per procedure, 'In-Line Statistical Secondary Inspections of Products Filled in Lyo Operations, effective 4/27/01 and current version 10/05/01 a minor defect will allow up to === vials of stainless steel particles out of ===vials manually inspected whereas the critical defect rejected on ===vial, c) The vials with visible particulates have not been placed on stability, and a safety assessment has not been conducted, d) The automated inspection equipment. is not qualified to detect and reject the lyo cake with visible stainless steel particles. There are no procedures to direct 1000% Manual inspection of lots of MMR or VARIVAX, even though the automated inspection process is not capable of rejecting vials with the visible aggiomerated Stainless Steel particles.", and
WHEREAS environmentalists are starting to investigate the effects of toxins in our environment that could be causing brain damage in our children. It has to be recognized that vaccination is an important delivery vehicle for many lethal environmental toxins. It was a struggle to get the government to admit that lead was toxic to children. But the ice has been broken and last year the Centers for Disease Control spent $6 million on what they call "Body Burden Studies" to evaluate the effects of chemicals on pregnant mothers and children. The quantities of toxins in these vaccines are not minute. In the case of mercury, the DPT, Hib, Hep B and OPV often given in one office visit contain 62.5 micrograms of mercury. The EPA guidelines for "safe" mercury levels are .1 microgram per kilogram of bodyweight per day. Babies can receive 30 to 50 times the "safe" amount in one office visit. [Halsey NA, Limiting infant exposure to thimerosal in vaccines and other sources of mercury. JAMA, 1999, 282:1763-66]. It is only a matter of time before vaccination becomes an environmental issue, and
WHEREAS all vaccine package inserts warn against the possibility of anaphylactic shock due to highly allergenic ingredients. The PDR is riddled with warnings about various substances found in the vaccines: "Persons who have experienced anaphylactic reactions to topically or systemically administered neomycin should not receive measles vaccine." [Mumpsvax, Merck, 2001] "Hypersensitivity to yeast or any other component of the vaccine is a contraindication for use of the vaccine." [Heb B, Engerix-B, SmithKline Beecham, 2001] "Persons with a history of anaphylactic, anaphalactoid, or other immediate reactions subsequent to egg ingestion should not be vaccinated." [Measles & Rubella, M-R-VAX II, Merck, 2001] "This product contains dry natural latex rubber as follows:. . ." [Hib, ActHIB, Aventis Pasteur] It is progress that there are all of these warnings of possible death from anaphylactic shock. When babies are just a few hours or a few weeks or months old, how is it possible to know if they are allergic to any of these drugs, toxins, animal parts or chemicals? No tests are available to determine if infants will be sensitive to any of these ingredients. Failure to test for these allergies prior to vaccine administration constitutes a violation of the Nuremberg Code, and
WHEREAS every year the list of mandated vaccines for school entry grows and infants and children receive more and more vaccines concurrently earlier and earlier, the prevalence of severe neurological and autoimmune disorders among young children is skyrocketing. Published in 1986, a National Health Interview Survey found that between 1969 and 1981 there was a 44 percent increases in "activity-limiting chronic conditions" of children under the age of 17. Respiratory diseases increased 47 percent, asthma 60 percent, mental and nervous orders increased 80 percent, personality disorders went up 300 percent and diseases of the eyes and ears rose 120 percent. From 1960 to 1980 the number of disabled youth in the U.S. doubled to more than two million children. Conditions not associated with vaccine damage remained stationary or actually declined during this period. [ Vaccinations, Deception and Tragedy , Michael Dye, 1999, p. 100]. According to Dr. Harold Buttram, MD in an October 1998 article in the Townsend Newsletter: "There is at present an ominous trend of deteriorating health among large segments of American children. As one example there is a rapid increase in the incidence, severity, and death rate from asthma. Developmental delay, children requiring special education, and autism are rapidly increasing in incidence. The incidence of autism is now soaring with an estimated incidence of 250,000 autistic children in America which represents a 10 to 15-times increase in the past 50 or so years, a time period concurrent with mass childhood vaccine programs. These figures are the estimates of Bernard Rimland, Ph. D., internationally recognized as a leading authority on autism, based on more than 40 years of experience in the field. Dr. Rimland has publicly stated his opinion that vaccines are one of the major contributory causes of the increasing incidence of autism.", and
WHEREAS according to Telford Taylor, who gave opening statements for the US at the Nuremberg Trial, Nazi war crimes were as follows: 1) High altitude experiments, 2) Freezing experiments 3) Malaria Experiments ( Vaccinations ) 4) Mustard Gas Experiments, 5) Sea-Water Experiments, 6) Epidemic Jaundice ( Vaccinations ) 7) Sterilization Experiments ( injections of caladium sequinum ) 8) Typhus ( Vaccinations-included a variety of diseases-typhus, yellow fever, smallpox, paratyphoid A and B, cholera and diphtheria ) 9) Poison Experiments 10) Incendiary Bomb Experiments 11) Jewish Skeleton Collection. Four of the eleven counts had to do with toxic inoculations and yet American Codes developed for dealing with using prison inmates in medical experiments after WWII always exclude vaccinations from the list of things you cannot experiment with! [The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation, George J. Annas and Michael A. Grodin, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, a 1992, p. 67-93, 192]
WHEREAS according to testimony of "The Mengele Twins and Human Experimentation: A Personal Account of Eva Mozes-Kor": " In 1948, Miriam and I applied for a visa to emigrate to the newly formed country of Israel. In 1960, I married an American tourist and came to live in the United States. My son Alex was born in 1961 and my daughter Rina in 1963. I have tried to obtain copies of the medical experimentation records from the U.S. Government. My sister Miriam suffers from renal disease, and I have donated my left kidney to her. To this day, we do not know what substances were injected into us when we served as Mengele's guinea pigs. The dignity of all human beings must be respected, preserved, and protected at all costs; life without dignity is mere existence. I experienced such loss of dignity every day as a guinea pig in Dr. Mengele's laboratory. Forty-five years later, I still feel deep pain and anger for the way I was treated by the doctors. Theses same doctors had taken an oath to help and to save human life." [ The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation , George J. Annas and Michael A. Grodin, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, a 1992, p. 53-59] Many parents of severely vaccine injured, or deceased children express the same sentiments: They do not really know what was injected into the child and they feel terribly betrayed by the doctor and the government, and
WHEREAS the Nuremberg Code did not come out of thin air but was preceded by a very similar document written by a Dr. Moses and incorporated as a Health Regulation into the German Health Codes in about 1930. It was written in response to an event that occurred in Lubeck: 72 infants died from an experimental tuberculosis vaccination. Two doctors were imprisoned and one of the two committed suicide in jail. Subsequently, the German Legislature passed a law saying that dogs could not be used in medical experiments thereby justifying the use of Jews. Because the "Lubeck (Nuremberg Code) Code" was only a health regulation and never passed by the German Legislature it did not enjoy the same legal status as the one barring the use of dogs. The law passed by legislative vote superceded the Health Regulations that were meant to criminalize what happened in the German Concentration Camps. . [ The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation , George J. Annas and Michael A. Grodin, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, a 1992, p. 129-131] Obviously, there are number of lessons from this story. One is that the Nuremberg Code which was never formally adopted (by legislative vote) by either the United States or Germany as a legal statute still today does not enjoy the force of law. Secondly, the Nuremberg Code was actually inspired by the practice of experimental vaccinations on infants. Until the US Constitution formally includes the Nuremberg Code as a Constitutional Amendment this kind of experimentation on infants will continue to be legal in the US. Thirdly, the NJ Vaccination regulations probably do not enjoy the force of law unless they are backed by either state or federal statutes. To my knowledge, the Hepatitis B Vaccination Mandate signed into law in August of 2002 by Governor McGreevey is the only vaccine mandate that was passed legislatively in NJ. Until the Homeland Security Bill passed last fall mandating the smallpox vaccine there were no federally mandated vaccinations. All were mandated at the state level, and
WHEREAS sometimes the government has a population control agenda in the use of forced vaccinations. During the early 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) had been overseeing massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in a number of countries, among them Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. In October 1994, HLI (Human Life International) received a communication from its Mexican affiliate, the Comite' Pro Vida de Mexico, regarding that country's anti-tetanus campaign. Suspicious of the campaign protocols, the Comite' obtained several vials of the vaccine and had them analyzed by chemists. Some of the vials were found to contain human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a pregnancy. In nature the hCG hormone alerts the woman's body that she is pregnant and causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but for the elevated presence of hCG. However, when introduced into the body coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only against tetanus but also against hCG . In this case, the body fails to recognize hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. The antibodies will attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy . (1) HLI reported the sketchy facts regarding the Mexican tetanus vaccines to its World Council members and affiliates in more than 60 countries.(2) Soon additional reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones began to drift in from the Philippines, where more than 3.4 million women were recently vaccinated. Similar reports came from Nicaragua, which had conducted its own vaccination campaign in 1993.
Here are the known facts concerning the tetanus vaccination campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines: Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.) But aren't men at least as likely as young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why are they excluded? Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It does not belong there-the vaccine has been "contaminated." The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections-three within three months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for? (3) WHO has been actively involved for more that 20 years in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier-the exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua vaccines ., ["Are New Vaccines Laced with Birth-Control Drugs?" Credit: Copyright June/July 1995 by James A. Miller, special correspondent for Human Life International. This article was originally published in HLI Reports , Human Life International, Gaithersburg, Maryland; June/July 1995, Volume 13, Number 8. Permission to reprint granted to Thinktwice/New Atlantean Press.
Think Twice Global Vaccine Institute at: [http://thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm]. This is an example of the government (WHO?) purposely creating an autoimmune disorder with vaccines, and
WHEREAS drug industry critic Pat Mooney (head of Canadian-based ETC Group, a nonprofit organization that monitors corporations' plans to patent life forms and genes) notes that "focusing on the sick is not profitable, at least from Big Pharma's point of view. Most folks get well or die, neither of which is good for business. There's far more money in serving customers who are basically well." [ A Drug for All Reasons-The pharmaceutical industry now targets healthy people as a prime market , by Miriam Karmel, Utne Reader , July-August 2003.] This is not a new concept. Vaccination critics have always perceived this as the prime motive for vaccinating as well. "Jenner.succeeded .as the popularizer of a means by which doctors could make money out of people who were quite well, and who, before his time, might have passed their whole lives without paying a farthing to a doctor. Such a discovery was irresistible." [Doctor's Delusions , George Bernard Shaw, 1932, p.9-10], and
WHEREAS one hundred years ago, children received one vaccine (the smallpox vaccine). Forty years ago children received 5 vaccines routinely (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio, and smallpox) and as many as 8 shots by two years of age. Children now receive 52 vaccines, in the form of 15 shots by the time they are one year of age, if they receive all the recommended shots, including the Prevnar pediatric pneumonia shot. The group most responsible for this is the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). [Mark Sircus Ac., OMD, The Story with Mercury/Cry of the Heart, 2003 [http://www.worldpsychology.net] The government issued Jordan Report of 1998 (Accelerated Development of Vaccines Division of Microbiology and Infectious Disease-National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease (NIH)) describes 357 new vaccines in various stages of research and development. Do they expect legislators to force all of these vaccinations by law?.and
WHEREAS "conflicts of interest" is a serious problem fueling the pressure to mandate more vaccinations. 'Rep. Dan Burton, (R-Ind.), who has been investigating vaccines for four years, said conflicts at the CDC are a problem, particularly on the vaccine advisory panel. He believes vaccines triggered his grandson's autism. "This presents a real paradox when the CDC routinely allows scientists with blatant conflicts of interest to serve on influential advisory committees that make recommendations on new vaccines, as well as policy matters," Burton told UPI. "All the while these same scientists have financial ties, academic affiliations, and other vested interests in the products and companies for which they are supposed to be providing unbiased oversight."' [ UPI Investigates: The vaccine conflict, by Mark Benjamin, Investigations Editor, Published 7/20/2003 8:45 AM [http://www.upi.com], and
WHEREAS according Alfred Russel Wallace's testimony to the Royal Commission: "They overlook the fact that a century ago was a pre-scientific age; and nothing proves this more clearly than the absence of any systematic "control' experiments, and the extreme haste with which doctors expressed belief in life-long protection only 4 years after Jenner's discovery had first been announced. This slim testimony caused Parliament to vote Jenner £10,000 in 1892. Shortly after Jenner got his £10,000 it became obvious that the vaccines did not work, but the Medical Establishment and the House of Commons would lose face if they admitted this so instead they gave Jenner £20,000 more in 1807, endowed vaccination with £3,000 a year in 1808, and after providing for free vaccination in 1840, made the operation compulsory in 1853, and enforced it by penalties in 1867." [ VACCINATION A DELUSION, Its Penal Enforcement a Crime: Proved by the official evidence in the Reports of the Royal Commission . By Alfred Russel Wallace, a 1898.] "Conflicts of interest" have plagued vaccination policy since its inception, however, this information has been long and well suppressed, and
WHEREAS in 1902 Cambridge, Massachusetts' Board of Health passed an ordinance requiring everyone to be vaccinated for smallpox every five years or pay a $5 fine for non-compliance. Henning Jacobson and his son had both suffered severe and prolonged reactions to the vaccine in childhood. Jacobson refused the vaccine and to pay the fine. His case went before a trial court and the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Both found him guilty. In 1904, Jacobson vs. Massachusetts went before the U.S. Supreme Court, the only vaccination case to date to reach the highest court. The Supreme Court ignored compelling evidence that the vaccines did not work and were dangerous. "While we do not decide and cannot decide that vaccination is a preventative of smallpox, we take judicial notice of the fact that this is the common belief of the people of the State, and with this fact as a foundation we hold that the statute in question is a health law, enacted as a reasonable and proper exercise of police power ." [ What Every Parent Should Know About Childhood Vaccinations , Jamie Murphy, 1993, p. 122-125] In this day and age of scientific sophistication "common belief" is not acceptable. Either the pharmaceutical industry and the government can PROVE SCIENTIFICALLY that the vaccines work or more likely, they cannot. If there is no absolute proof that the vaccines prevent disease, it is criminal to force the blatantly unsafe surgical procedure by law, and
WHEREAS the basis for most religious objections to vaccination resides in dietary laws. Certainly, vaccinations are not Kosher (Leviticus). Some Catholic leaders in the US are finally saying that Catholics opposed to abortion should not take vaccines containing aborted fetuses. [See the Catholic religious exemption letter at: [http://www.cogforlife.org]. There are also clear Biblical proscriptions against mixing animal and human blood (Ezekiel). Lastly, many Buddhists and Hindus do not eat meat. When an animal is slaughtered for food, the pain and suffering and fright experienced by the animal remain in the meat in the form of negative energy. Many religious groups find it undesirable to take this kind of energy into the body. Therefore, the animal parts from a tortured animal would be that much worse. In the case of vaccinations, we are not just eating the meat we are injecting it directly into the bloodstream, and
WHEREAS formerly religious exemption from vaccination was granted only to Christian Scientists in New Jersey, the law was amended in the early 1990's to include all religions so as not to be discriminatory. Also, formerly the Health Department used a form where parents could just "check a box" if they were exercising their legal right to a religious exemption. Unfortunately, as of late the Health Department requires a letter from parents. Unless the letter reflects the language of a Christian Science objection: namely refusal of all drugs and surgery, the letters are casually being rejected in violation of New Jersey statutes. Christian Science is not considered to be a mainstream religion and the Health Department would like to believe that only extremists would refuse vaccinations. The vaccine ingredients as portrayed in the package inserts are in violation of every religion's dietary law, for various reasons cited previously. The NJ Health Department, probably at the request of the CDC, arbitrarily refuses to recognize these other valid religious exemptions, pre-empting the religious exemption law beyond the rightful authority of NJHD, and
WHEREAS according to Pediatrics, Vol. 107, No. 2, Feb. 2001, p.e17 , less that half of physicians reported initiating discussions regarding vaccine contraindications and less that 10% discussed the National Vaccine Injury Compensation program. Nearly 1 in 4 physicians indicated that "parents would be unnecessarily alarmed" and a surprising number believed that "parents did not want to know" vaccine risks. Terry Rondberg, D.C. president of the World Chiropractic Alliance (WCA) said (as a result of passing a Philosophical Exemption Law in Texas, in May 2003) "Pediatricians should be welcoming the opportunity to have an open dialogue with parents about vaccination so they can be partners, not adversaries with parents in making these important health decisions. No one should be forced to take a health care risk they don't want to take. Only when you own a decision that involves a risk can you take responsibility for it." Passing a "philosophical/conscientious exemption to vaccinations law" will most importantly defuse the adversarial relationship that now exists between the Health Department, Education Department, some physicians and parents, and
WHEREAS "Our legislators should be told at every possible opportunity that, by permitting the vaccination laws to continue on the statute books, they are responsible for the deterioration of the race, for untold agony, physical and mental, and for countless legalized though officially-concealed murders. We are far too mealy-mouthed about this matter. Plain speaking is needed to battle with the prejudices of officialdom and the vested interests of the medical profession. 'Lymph' is a false term. It is diseased and disease-bearing matter, and should be called pus, and its willful insertion into the skin of any human being should be called blood-poisoning, and denounced as a crime of the first magnitude. Thus only can we bring home to the average legislator his responsibility for the terrible consequences of his ignorance and his submission to a prejudiced and interested profession." [Prof. Alfred Russel Wallace in The Vaccination Inquirer , May 1911, p. 42] [ The Vaccination Problem , Joseph P. Swan, London: Daniel, a 1936, p. 196]
NOW WE THE PEOPLE REQUEST LEGAL SPONSORSHIP OF AND MANDITORIUM TO:
1) Philosophical Exemption for vaccinations in New Jersey which gives the right to all citizens to refuse vaccinations without persecution, threatened access to schools and workplaces, or of loss of jobs. And which allows children to be exempted from the vaccination requirement if one parent or guardian objects through the use of a Standardized Health form by checking a box, as had been previously done with religious exemption in the state of New Jersey. All adults will be covered by this exemption as well.
2) That the clause in the Sanitation Codes (Code 26:1A-7) of the New Jersey State Constitution which gives the Public Health Council (an unpaid 7 member panel appointed by the Governor, also often with "conflicts of interest" issues), unchecked authority to write vaccination mandates for our children be repealed . Very few other of the 50 states have this arrangement, and legislators refused to give this enormous power to the Health Department in Texas as recently as last year.
3) That the New Jersey State Constitution be amended to include the Nuremberg Code, thereby giving informed consent regarding vaccinations the force of law which it sadly and with serious consequences does not now enjoy.
4) That the New Jersey State Legislative Bodies will abide in the future by the Precautionary Principle: "First do no harm" in evaluating legislation to force injected poisons into our children for Pharmaceutical Profits. Let us let "common belief," "herd immunity theory," and "anti-body theory" no longer be the deciding factors as to whether we will force vaccines in the future. We are now in a supposedly scientific age. Theories and beliefs are not good enough when we have "Shaken Baby Syndrome" accusations and autism epidemics ravaging families. From this day forward we must be guided by hard scientific proof of safety and efficacy not just for vaccines, but for everything before we legislate it. If legislators perceive themselves to be not qualified to make such an evaluation of scientific technicalities, let all abstain. Government should be in the business of providing sanitation, but it should not be in the business of Commercialized Medicine.
Written by:
Barbara Flynn, Founder of C.H.E.R.U.B.S.
(Children Having Everybody Really Upset 'Bout Shots)
10 Irving Place
Summit, NJ 07901
(908) 273-2792