You are here: PDR Analysis / Ages for vaccine administration, Long Term Studies & Efficacy Disclaimers: Table 1
Instructions (to vaccinators): "All vaccines can be administered to persons with mild illness such as diarrhea, mild upper-respiratory infection with or without low-grade fever, or other low grade febrile illness." [DTaP, Tripedia, Aventis Pasteur]"Pre-term infants should be vaccinated according to their chronological age, calculated from date of birth." [DTaP, Acel-Imune, Lederle Consumer] "Routine administration of DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) and /or OPV (oral polio vaccine), concomitantly with measles, mumps and rubella vaccines is not recommended because there are insufficient data relating to the simultaneous administration of these antigens. However, the American Academy of Pediatrics has noted that in some circumstances, particularly when the patient may not return, some practitioners prefer to administer all these antigens on a single day. If done, separate sites and syringes should be used for DTP and M-R VAX II." [Measles & Rubella Live, M-R VAX II, Merck] This is one of the most controversial and disturbing features of the vaccine product inserts. According to an audiotape lecture by medical historian, Harris Coulter, Ph.D., in the 1920's and 30's doctors were formerly aware of a period of time following vaccination called the "negative phase". In the "negative phase" the immune system is particularly weak during the period it is responding to injected toxins or 'creating antibodies' so called. Doctors did not want to vaccinate babies who were ill because the immune system was already challenged because of illness. SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) babies die in the so-called "negative phase". It is also well know that pre-term (low birth weight) babies are not as robust and healthy as full-term etc. and they are more likely to die from vaccination. These are some quotes from the PDR: When you consider the above quotes with the description of the extremely toxic vaccine ingredients (Table 2) and the death riddled Adverse Reactions (Table 3) they are quite chilling and do not inspire confidence in those who advocate and administer vaccinations. The above proscriptions seem to be defying conventional medical wisdom and suggest that the health care provider may be just a glorified drug salesman who dutifully takes orders from the pharmaceutical bosses. Even worse, it suggests that vaccination is really a 'survival of the fittest' test or more bluntly a population control practice. This is in violation of article 7 of the Nuremberg Code, which states that "Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death." Additionally, you should take careful notice of my letter from Dr. Eddy Breznitz, Assistant NJ Health Commissioner, dated December 20, 2000. In it he acknowledges that the CDC has had a bounty of $100 on the head of every baby vaccinated completely, and on schedule by the age of two years. Although he says that the program is no longer in effect, there could be something new. No Long-Term Studies : Even though vaccinations have been officially around for over 200 years (said to be discovered by Edward Jenner in 1796) no long-term studies have ever been conducted on vaccinations to determine if they are safe or even more importantly if they ever worked. This is in clear violation of article 3 of the Nuremberg Code which states: "The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment." Studies being done to measure the adverse reactions to vaccinations are unbelievably short . They are performed on children of ages other than the ones to be vaccinated, and with unbelievably small samples. "147 healthy infants and children (up to 10 years of age) were monitored for 5 days after each dose." [Hep B, Recombivax HB, Merck] "The number of subjects studied with TriHIBit, ActHIB combined with Tripedia by reconstitution, was inadequate to detect rare serious adverse events." [Hib, ActHIB, Aventis Pasteur] "In testing, children were monitored daily for five days after each injection for local reactions and systemic complaints." [Hib/Hep B, Comvax, Merck] According to Rampton and Stauber, authors of Trust Us, We're Experts: How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with your Future: A host of techniques exist for manipulating research protocols to produce studies whose conclusions fit their sponsor's predetermined interests. These techniques include adjusting the time of a study (so that toxic effects do not have time to emerge), subtle manipulations of target and control groups or dosage levels, and subjective interpretations of complex data. Often such methods stop short of outright fraud, but lead to predictable results. (p. 218) This is in blatant violation of article 8 of the Nuremberg code, which states: "The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment." No long-term studies, short-term studies or efficacy studies were required at the inception of our government mandated vaccination program and so the drug companies have really never had an incentive to do them. That has been left to independent researchers whose studies have put pressure on vaccine manufacturers to admit that they are not doing studies at all. 'Cancer, genetic mutation and fertility impairment' : There are many studies conducted by independent researchers (those not funded by pharmaceutical companies), which demonstrate problems with vaccines. The most obvious 'cancer' reference would be to the infamous SV-40 Monkey Kidney virus the polio vaccines have been contaminated with apparently since the 1950's. This was extensively documented in New York Magazine , November 11, 1996. Many adults are now contracting a rare brain cancer that contains the SV-40 virus. When I attended the last NVIC Conference in September 2000, I met Raphaele and Michael Horwin who lost their two-and-a-half year old son, Alexander in 1999 to brain cancer also showing the SV-40 Virus. Additionally, one of the speakers at the conference was a lawyer named Stanley Kops from Philadelphia. He spoke of his little known success in suing the US Government on behalf of people who, while not vaccinated against polio themselves, had acquired "provocation" paralytic polio from their vaccinated baby's saliva or diapers. The first case, Griffen vs. United States was won in 1975. The lawyers were able to show that the DBS (Division of Biological Standards) had not met their own internal acceptance standards before releasing polio vaccine to the public. They knowingly let faulty products onto the market. Stanley Kops commented that there was no media coverage at the time or since he won this case. He said that being a young lawyer, he thought he had really taught the government a lesson. Thirteen years later in 1988, he was trying the same case again ( Berkovitz vs. United States ) which he won and which also provided the seed for a class action suit by seven people including Berkovitz against Lederle, which he also won. Stanley Kops brought out a number of points about this polio vaccine, which the public and more importantly, the doctors who administer polio vaccines, are largely unaware of. Firstly, the polio epidemic was largely manufactured by the media and was never as widespread as the public was lead to believe. Secondly, sometime during the life span of this polio vaccine in about the early 1950's, the African Green Monkey was substituted for the chimp that was previously being tortured to make polio vaccine. (Polio is grown on the kidneys of these monkeys. When pus forms it is scraped off and dried and put into vaccines. If HIV or SV-40 viruses are in the pus, there is no way to test for or know this. Production of theses vaccines is very primitive and not nearly as well controlled or understood as the public believes them to be.) There was no testing done on the polio vaccine to determine if it was equivalent to the previous vaccine after the African Green Monkey was substituted. What is significant about this is that the African Green Monkey harbors the Simian SV-40 virus. The contaminated vaccine went onto the market (and remains) without knowledge or concern for this serious contamination. Of great interest was that the parents attending the conference of children who had died of cancer all found SV-40 virus in their children's tumors. There was talk of trying the government officials, who have knowingly left this defective vaccine on the market for the last 25 years, for crimes against humanity. This is in blatant violation of article 5 of the Nuremberg Code, which states: "No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects." 'Mutagenic potential' : There was another researcher, Dr. Howard Urnovitz, Ph.D. from San Francisco, who has spent most of his career creating animal vaccines. He said that any time animal proteins are injected into the human body, they immediately turn into nucleic acid. Nucleic acid has the ability to alter the RNA of a human cell. He suggested that anyone who tells you that they can predict what animal proteins will do to the human body when injected into the bloodstream should not be taken seriously. There has been a lot of emphasis on Mercury being the culprit in bad vaccine reactions. I am absolutely certain that it is not a good idea to inject anyone with mercury. However, the smallpox vaccine was killed and maimed people without benefit of mercury. It is widely recognized that autoimmune disorders originate with animal serum proteins injected into the body. The foreign proteins get stuck in cells where they do not belong. The immune system gets so worn out trying to rid the body of these foreign proteins, that it eventually turns on itself thereby creating an autoimmune disease. Removing the toxic chemicals from vaccines is not going to make them desirable or effective. [Laurie Perrin Testimony] In 1980 a report in Mutation Research, found that children vaccinated and then revaccinated for smallpox in Czechoslovakia showed chromosomal aberrations in their white blood cells. The authors concluded that the vaccine had a mutagenic effect on human chromosomes. [ Vaccinations, Deception & Tragedy , Michael Dye, c. 1999, p. 120] 'Fertility impairment' : Registered Dog Breeder, Ashleigh Oulton in Australia, testified that she and other dog breeders had to stop vaccinating dogs to get them to reproduce. ".Even once they've stopped vaccinating, residue results through infertility, arthritic conditions.dogs have one tenth of the length of a generation that a human does, so what we are seeing in dogs today is what we will see in the future with humans, and that's a really frightening thing. . ." This was taken from the Australian Video: Vaccination-The Hidden Truth , Copyright Taycare Pty Ltd (Web: www.vaccination.inoz.com) "Animal reproductive studies have not been conducted with IPOL ." [Poliovirus, IPOL, Aventis Pasteur] That means that no information is being gathered to determine if there are developmental malformations etc. from vaccinations given in infancy. Between 70% and 90% of parents of autistic children believe that the vaccinations caused their children's severe neurological problems. I happen to be one of them. Autism is just one example of the types of damage that can be caused by vaccination. Encephalitis is listed in Adverse Reactions to almost every single childhood vaccination. I would highly recommend Vaccination, Social Violence and Criminality: The Medical Assault on the American Brain , by Harris Coulter, Ph.D. c. 1990, for anyone interested in the relationship between encephalitis, encephalopathy and autism (the symptoms of each are all identical). "It is also not known whether IPOL can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity." The Chickenpox vaccine, which has a notoriously low efficacy rate by admission in the PDR, can infect someone who did not receive the vaccine through exposure by someone who did receive the vaccine. This is called Provocation Chickenpox. Fortunately Merck is trying to study it right now. "Merck & Co. maintains a Pregnancy Registry to monitor fetal outcomes of pregnant women exposed to VARIVAX. Patients and healthcare providers are encouraged to report any exposure to VARIVAX during pregnancy by calling (800) 986-8999. As with any vaccine, there is the possibility that broad use of the vaccine could reveal adverse reactions not observed in clinical trials." [Chickenpox, VARIVAX, Merck] I wonder how many pediatricians ask mothers of young children if they are currently pregnant or plan to be before they administer this shot? Why are mothers being expected to take this kind of risk with unborn children? "It is not known whether IPOL is excreted in human milk." [Polio, IPOL, Aventis Pasteur] The reason this became of interest is because of studies done by Dr. Edward Yasbak, MD of Massachusetts. His two grandsons are autistic. He has done studies on the MMR (Measles, Mumps and Rubella) vaccine that demonstrate a higher rate of autism among children whose mothers received and MMR vaccine shortly before or after pregnancy. He determined that antigens were getting into the breast milk. There is some statistical validity to the samples he has taken correlating contaminated breast milk with autism. Vaccination Substitutions: In addition to the fact that no long term studies are being conducted on vaccinations by those who profit financially from the sale of them, there is also the issue of substituting new vaccinations for ones that are on the market without any testing at all! One example of this is the Hepatits B vaccine currently on the market. The PDR for both the Merck and SmithKline version state. "Testing was done on the plasma-derived vaccine." [Not this one.] Please see the enclosed letter from Dr. Severyn to Congressman Burton regarding this matter. Another vaccine Tetramune was a four-in-one vaccine that was substituted for giving DPT and Hib separately. This was a very sick human experiment with very dismal results, so dismal that that vaccine does not appear in the 2001 PDR. I do have a copy of it from last year's PDR. If you look at the PDR for all of the Hib vaccines for 2001 they recommend reconstituting it with a DPT shot so effectively it is a four-in-one. Many parents do not realize that their babies got four-in-one shots until after they are severely damaged and they go back and check the records. This practice seems to me to be blatantly in violation of the informed consent spirit of the Nuremberg Code. Unpublished data on file at Pharmaceutical Companies . This brings out the point that studies used to justify FDA acceptance of vaccinations is not available for peer review which is highly unusual and makes the data very suspect. In her book Vaccinations , Australian Medical researcher Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. does a quite exhaustive review of the inconsistencies in medical studies used in vaccine research. Most particularly, she points out that when babies die in these vaccination studies, they are "thrown out" of the study. Researchers justify this by saying it is "just a coincidence" that the baby died 3 or 4 days after vaccination. There is no curiosity about why the baby died or if it could have been vaccine related. One blatant example of this discrepancy is the Navajo Indian Study referenced in the Hib vaccine PDR's. No deaths are mentioned in the PDR. However Viera Scheibner requested the original data. She points out that 8 babies died in the control group and 8 babies died in the vaccinated group. When vaccination studies are done, even the control group gets vaccinated. So those who think that vaccinated babies are being compared with completely unvaccinated babies are mislead. The reason that vaccinated babies cannot be compared with unvaccinated babies is that no babies would die in the control (unvaccinated) group and there would have to be an admission that SIDS only occurs in vaccinated babies. This is not proper scientific method or intellectual integrity by any stretch of the imagination. In order for studies to be considered scientific, they have to be available to be refuted. Since Medical Research is always done with the endpoint in mind it is impossible to refute their hypotheses. "The difference between science and pseudoscience . is that genuinely scientific theories are "falsifiable"-that is, they are formulated in such a way that if they are wrong, they can be proven false through experiments. By contrast, pseudosciences are formulated so vaguely that they can never be proven or disproven.. . .By this criterion you will find that a surprising number of seemingly scientific assertions-perhaps many in which you devoutly believe-are complete nonsense. Rather surprisingly this is not to assert that all pseudoscientific claims are untrue. Some of them may be true, but you can never know this, so they are not entitled to claim the cast-iron assurance that reliance that you can have, and place, in scientific facts." [Trust Us, We're Experts!, Sheldon Rampton & John Stauber, c. 2001, p. 56] Disclaimers of Vaccination Efficacy : ". . .it may not prevent infection in individuals who do not achieve protective antibody titers." [Hep B, Engerix-B, SmithKline Beecham] "The evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between immunization with Hib conjugate vaccines and early-onset of Hib Disease." [Hib, ActHIB, Aventis Pasteur] "Liquid PedvaxHIB will not protect against disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae other than type b or against other microorganisms that cause invasive disease such as meningitis or sepsis." [Hib, Liquid PedvaxHIB, Merck] "As reported with Haemophilus B Polysaccharide Vaccine and another Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccine, cases of Haemophilus b Disease may occur in the week after the vaccination, prior to the onset of the protective effects of the vaccine."[Hib/HepB, Comvax, Merck] "There is some evidence to suggest that infants who are born to mothers who had natural measles and who are vaccinated at less than one year of age may not develop sustained antibody levels when later revaccinated." [MMR. M-M-R II, Merck] "Excretion of small amounts of the live attenuated rubella virus from the nose and throat has occurred in the majority of susceptible individuals 7-28 days after vaccination. There is no confirmed evidence to indicate that such virus is transmitted to susceptible persons who are in contact with the vaccinated individuals. Consequently, transmission through close personal contact, while accepted as a theoretical possibility, is not regarded as a significant risk. However, transmission of the rubella vaccine virus to infants via breast milk has been documented." [MR, BIAVAX II, Merck] "The duration of protection of VARIVAX is unknown at present and the need for booster doses is not defined. Post-marketing experience suggests that transmission of vaccine virus may occur rarely between healthy vacinees who develop a varicella-like rash and healthy susceptible contacts. Transmission of vaccine virus from vaccinees without a varicella-like rash has been reported. Among a subset of vaccinees who were actively followed, 259 were exposed to an individual with chickenpox in a household setting.20% reported a mild form of chickenpox." [Chickenpox, VARIVAX, Merck] "As with any vaccine, vaccination with JE-VAX may not result in protection in all individuals. Long-term protections, as demonstrated by persistence of neutralizing antibody for more than two years, has not been shown." [Jap Encepahlitis Virus, JE-VAX, Aventis Pasteur] "Since a positive tuberculin reaction does not necessarily indicate the presence of active tuberculosis disease, individuals showing such positive tuberculin reactions should be subjected to other diagnostic procedures, such as X-ray examination of the chest and microbiological examination of the sputum." [Tuberculin PPD (Mantoux) injected tuberculin testing, Tubersol, Aventis Pasteur] Comments on the Efficacy of vaccinations : According to Dr. Dean Black, author of Immunization: Compulsion or Choice , when we say that vaccinations are 70% to 90% effective we mean that 70 to 90% of all persons vaccinated will produce antibodies. According to Walene James, author of Immunization , The Reality Behind the Myth , c. 1995: "Vaccines isolate antibody function, and allow it to substitute for the entire immune response. Scientific evidence questioning the role of antibodies in disease protection can be found in research performed by Dr. Alec Burton, published in a study by the British Medical Council in May 1950. The study investigated the relationship between the incidence of diphtheria and the presence of antibodies. Since Diphtheria was epidemic at, or just prior to, the time of the study, the researchers had a large number of cases to investigate. The purpose of the research was to determine the existence or nonexistence of antibodies in people who developed diphtheria and in those who did not. It looked at patients and people who were in close proximity to patients, such as physicians, nurses in hospitals, family, and friends. The conclusion was that there was no relation whatsoever between antibody count and incidence of disease. The researchers found people who were highly resistant with extremely low antibody counts, and people who developed the disease who had high antibody counts. Dr. Burton also discovered that children born with a-gamma globulinemia (an inability to produce antibodies) develop and recover from measles and other infectious or contagious disease almost as spontaneously as other children." [http://www.garynull.com/Documents/vaccines-2ndopinion_excerpt. htm] Jamie Murphy, author of What Every Parent Should Know About Childhood Immunizations , c. 1993 feels that introducing antigens directly into the bloodstream can prove dangerous. "When a child gets a naturally occurring infection, like measles, which is not a serious disease, the body reacts to that in a very set way. The germs go in a certain part of the body through the threat and into the different immune organs, and the body combats the disease in its own natural way. There are all sorts of immune reactions that occur. Inflammatory response reactions, macrophages, and different kinds of white blood cells are used to combat the virus. You also cough and sneeze and get rid of the virus that way. When you inject a vaccine into the body, you're actually performing an unnatural act because you are injection directly into the blood system. That is not the natural port of entry for that virus. In fact, the whole immune system in our body is geared to prevent that from happening. What we're doing is giving the virus or the bacteria carte blanche entry into our bloodstream, which is the last place you want it to be. This increases the chance for disease because viral material from the vaccine stays in the cells, and is not completely defeated by the body's own defenses. You overload the body." http://www.garynull.com/Documents/vaccines-2ndopinion_excerpt.htm Judging by the following definition found in the AMA Family Medical Guide , even the AMA has its doubts about the advantages of producing antibodies: "Antibodies are complex substances formed to neutralize or destroy foreign substances or organisms (antigens) in the blood. Each individual type of antibody recognized only the substance or organism that provokes its formation. Anti-body activity normally fights infection, but can be damaging in allergies and a group of maladies that are called autoimmune diseases." [ AMA Family Medical Guide , c. 1987, p. 789] The Chickenpox PDR even acknowledges that they do not know how long immunity lasts for (assuming that you have it at all). So there is no proof that vaccinations work. It is purely hypothetical. VAERS Reporting Instructions included : "Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, health-care providers and manufacturers are required to record and report certain suspected adverse events occurring within specific time periods after vaccination. However, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has established a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which will accept all reports of suspected events. A VAERS report form as well as information regarding reporting requirements can be obtained by calling VAERS 1-800-822-7967." [Mumps, MUMPSVAX, Merck] The Vaccine Injury Compensation Act of 1986 was established when the pharmaceutical companies realized that the fallout from these vaccines was large and they needed a way to have the taxpayer compensate victims of vaccine injury so that their own bottom lines would not suffer. The federal government was happy to help out. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Act not only gives the drug companies immunity from lawsuits it relieves them from the responsibility of telling you what is in this PDR: "No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after the effective date of this part (1986) solely do to the manufacturer's failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party (or the injured party's legal representative) of the potential dangers resulting from the administration of the vaccine manufactured by the manufacturer." [Public Health Service Act, Section 2122, Direct Warnings] This is in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code that specifies that you understand all of the risks and side effects of any medical procedure that you undergo when you are participating in a medical experiment. Since the PDR acknowledges that there are no long-term studies being done on vaccines and that they do not know how long the vaccines are effective for (assuming they are not just causing auto-immune disorders) or what the mechanism is for efficacy, the mass vaccination program is still very much a giant, lucrative medical experiment. The guidelines for accepting an injury as being caused by a vaccine are petty and unreasonable. For example, a child can die within 10 days of an MMR shot and qualify, but any more than one day after DPT does not. Consequently very few adverse reactions to vaccines are reportable or eligible for compensation. According to Rep. Mica's (R-Florida) September 28, 1999 Oversight Hearing on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, approximately three out of four are turned away from the compensation program. According to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., the Government did not fund the program well enough so after a few years they got backed up and people had to wait years to get money because the budget was not increased to meet the demand. So the Government started to litigate against the parents so that they would not have to pay out. Because they do not pay out there is now a huge surplus in the account and the Health Officials are claiming that that is because there are so few vaccine injuries. Doctors are extremely reluctant to report vaccine related deaths. In cases where parents told doctors that they thought the death was vaccine related. The doctor told them that if they ever mentioned that again he would accuse them of "Shaken Baby Syndrome". This is no idle threat. Please see "Was it Murder or a Bad Vaccine?" in Redbook, September 2000. Again, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act is a problem because it states that if the Death Certificate states that the baby died from a vaccine, the parents qualify for compensation. Coroners have difficulty writing that the baby died from a vaccine even if it is perfectly obvious, because the Pharmaceutical Companies are unwilling to give a profile of vaccine death for coroners to match. When parents complain, coroners have been known to say: "You are lucky you were not accused of "Shaken Baby Syndrome." If Charles Dickens were alive today he would be writing about the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and "Shaken Baby Syndrome." |
